UHM has recently been validated by neuro-scientific research whereas the Maslow's validity is still disputed in the psychological community.

1) Greater validation UHM has recently been validated by neuro-scientific research whereas the Maslow's validity is still disputed in the psychological community.

2) Superior interpretations While needs are at a deeper level of the psyche than motivations (wants) there is little we can do to adapt needs because they are so deep. Whereas the motivational level of the psyche is deep enough to affect greatly what we think, feel, and do, it is shallow enough to deal with it more consciously.

3) Wider impact on our lives Needs is in many ways narrower in our lives versus motivations which are more extensive and so affects more of our lives.

4) More dimensions Maslow’s is a 2-dimensional “levels” model while the UHM is a 3-dimensional and holographic model and so gives much greater insights into people.

5) Better accounting for real time changes Maslow’s model is hierarchical, with it we must go up one level at a time whereas the UHM shows how people move dynamically between levels in the moment.

6) Predictor of leadership capability The UHM shows the only leadership motivations (clue: only the selfless ones...).

Gain practical insights into what the UHM means for you on our PUBLIC MOTIVATIONAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM